Current Practices in Data Analysis Procedures in Psychology: What Has Changed?
In this case, databases used to compile studies and keywords that allow their inclusion in the study will be of special interest. The sections that must appear in a qualitative systematic review are: Introduction, Method Criteria for selecting studies for search and coding of variables , Results, Discussion and Conclusion, and References. If the systematic review is about psychometric properties of a psychological scale, the study may include a study of the quality of these psychometric properties with a scale built ad hoc for this study or using any other method e.
Psychometric studies. The structure of a psychometric study must be: Introduction including objectives and rationale for validation , Method Participants, Instruments, Procedure, and Statistical and Psychometric Analysis , Results, Discussion and Conclusion, and References. If the study includes an exploratory factor analysis, it is advisable to consult two recently published papers in our journal:.
For a study of the adaptation of a scale, it must clearly explain the back-translation process used. Manuscripts should contain evidence of empirical validity concurrent, convergent and discriminant with other scales.
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals | SpringerLink
If clinical diagnostic criteria or performance cut scores are included, preference will be given to those studies that provide evidence of the sensitivity and specificity, and provide psychometric norms. Methodological papers. These studies will be clearly highlighting the need for the study, the problem solving and its possible implementation for psychological practice. Given the eminently practical orientation of this journal, methodological studies that do not involve a clear improvement of the procedures used to date will not be accepted. Qualitative studies.
In this case, we will follow the same pattern of an empirical study, but should take special care in collecting the data, the coding system used, ensuring a review of the category system by external researchers to own study, description of the group of participants, and the use of appropriate data for such statistical techniques, where appropriate, such as interrater reliability coefficients and methods based on chi-square test for qualitative data. Theoretical studies.
The theoretical studies will be commissioned by the editorial team, and exceptionally will be accepteddepending on the quality of the study in the opinion of the editorial team. This study must be organized in: Introduction review objective approach to the subject , Development of theoretical content, Conclusions and References.
Special issues. The proposal should include the title, a summary of its main objectives and contents, name and contact of the coordinator of the special theme, an index of manuscripts, indicating authors contact address and titles. The Editorial Team will consider the proposal and will take decision to accept or reject this monograph. If accepted, the manuscripts must follow the rules for original manuscripts presented above. The abstract in Spanish must contain the same keywords Palabras Clave translated to Spanish.
To maximize the visibility of the study, authors must be very careful in choosing keywords, in such a way that keywords must appear in the title, abstract, and the text of the study. This will facilitate the search for the study in the usual search engines. The first level Introduction, Methods, Result, Discussion and Conclusions, and References will be justifiedto the left and in bold. The second level Participants, Procedure, etc.
The third level are indented 1 cm. Before and after each title there is a space. No appointment without reference. No reference without appointment. Only in justified cases will the end of the text, before the list of references. Tables and figures, and their corresponding titles and legends, will be presented on separate pages after references.
They will be numbered in sequential order from 1 and must always quote the immediately preceding text, with uppercase t and f in the first letter of Table or Figure e. The title of the table must be written above.
- Change They Cant Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America (Updated Edition).
- Effect size - Wikipedia.
- Hormones and brain plasticity.
- Introduction to Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms?
- PSY Statistical Program | UNSW Psychology;
Tables should follow APA style no visible vertical lines. All references are inserted in the text not footnotes and alphabetically arranged at the end under the heading "References. These rules must be followed precisely and the originals will be returned for corrections if all are not met. Delete any information that can identify the authors. To verify that no data on "author" and "subject" that should not see the sender of the study, to preserve anonymity , locate the file using Windows Explorer, locate the mouse over the file name and when it appears in data box, make sure that it is not the author's name.
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
Then, in this case with the cursor over the file, right click, go to Properties, then to summary and there removing that data if any. There they will click on the " Make a submission " button. On the next screen click on "Make a new submission". Then a new screen appears in which you have to follow five successive steps:. List of up to five possible expert reviewers in the subject of the article with indication of name and surname, institution and email , that are not from the same center or institution of the author. The Editorial Team may or may not use this list to review the work.
In case of conflict of interest with potential reviewers, a name of possible reviewer may be mentioned that the Editorial Team does not want to use to review the work. Prereg 0. Have there been improvements in the statistical reporting? Does the improvement in the use of some statistical practices represent a substantial change? Have there been improvements in open practices?
riffmolega.ga Lesson learned Our findings provide convergent support to the initiatives that emphasize the critical role of journal editors and reviewers in the promotion of reforms in scientific practices. Limitations Choice of comparison journal. Summing up To sum up, we cannot assess the extent that observed changes were caused by guideline changes, but it seems that changes in guidelines may be useful although not sufficient. PDF Click here for additional data file.
S6 File Complete Database. CSV Click here for additional data file. S7 File Clinical Psychological Science results. S1 Text Changes with respect to the preregistered study. S2 Text Examples of journals offering the option to submit pre-study peer review. Acknowledgments We are grateful to the Editor, Jelte M. Funding Statement The author s received no specific funding for this work. References 1. Pashler H, Wagenmakers EJ. Perspect Psychol Sci. November 1; 7 6 — Open Science Collaboration.
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
- MATLAB The Language of Technical Computing.
- Geothermal energy resources for developing countries.
- Author Guidelines;
- Leland Wilkinson - Google Scholar Citations.
- Statistical Methods in Theses: Guidelines and Explanations | Department of Psychology?
- On Genesis : two books : On Genesis against the Manichees ; and, On the literal interpretation of Genesis : an unfinished book!
Science August 28; :aac—aac Questions about Questionable Research Practices in the field of management. J Manage. January; 42 1 :5— J Bus Psychol. September 25; 31 3 — Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists. Pietschnig J, editor. March 15; 12 3 :e doi: Bakker M, Wicherts JM. The mis reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behav Res Methods.
September 15; 43 3 — Outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological research. Gluud LL, editor. July 29; 9 7 :e doi: Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the type I error rate in independent samples t tests: The power of alternatives and recommendations. Psychol Methods.
Related Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals Guidelines and Explanations
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved